Proof of defect in dangerous products

Abstract

Despite the arguments to put a specific definition , dangerous products can be defined as the products that do not have the element of safety and security which would cause tort to the consuming person, even if this tort is in the future. As the result, it differs from the products that are dangerous in nature, in order for the proof process to be completed, the three pillars must be available, which are defect, tort, and causation between them, and since it was unfair to prove these pillars on the aggrieved person. The legislator has put the responsibility for proving the defect on the judiciary, and the latter has to give  the aggrieved person some legal presumptions to prove tort and causation between them, because of insufficient evidence covered by the law to prove that these products are defective, it also needs other evidences which keep up with development in the field of progress and technology.