Citizenship and political participation: an interpretive approach to the relationship between citizenship and the implementation of the public good

Authors

  • .Imad Mu’ayed Jasim University of Diyala - College of Law and Political Science
  • Ayman Abd Own Nazal University of Diyala - College of Law and Political Science

Keywords:

Citizenship, Political Participation, Public Good

Abstract

Historically, the concept of citizenship reflects two different meanings. The first meaning focuses on the pure origins of the concept in that it was initially associated with the public participation of citizens in the management of political affairs. It was achieved typically in the states of ancient Greece. As for the second meaning, which was originally derived from the realities of the political expansion of the Roman Empire, it showed an interest in the legal aspect of citizenship in that it is a status that grants the individual rights and imposes duties on him. Undoubtedly, the meaning that focuses on citizenship in terms of requiring political participation, wanted to demonstrate the fact that the public is the most careful in deciding policies that serve the public interest. Therefore citizenship is not just a political association, but rather it is a means directed to achieving an end represented in serving the public good.

References

المصـــــــادر
References
First: Encyclopedias:
I. Roger M. Smith, Citizenship: Political, In: Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes (Editors), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier Ltd, 2001.
Second: Books:
I. Alex Williams, Political Hegemony and Social Complexity: Mechanisms of Power after Gramsci, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2020.
II. Andreas Schedler, Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, Colorado, 2006.
III. Bryan S. Turner, Citizenship and Capitalism: The Debate over Reformism, Routledge, London & New York, 2015.
IV. Elchanan Cohn, The Economics of Education, Revised Edition, Ballinger Publishing co, Cambridge, Massuchetes, 1979.
V. Gabriel A. Almond and Sidney Verba (Editors), The Civic Culture Revisited: An Analytic Study, Little & Brown, Boston, 1980.
VI. Gabriel A. Almond and Sidney Verba, The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Center for International Studies, Princeton University, 1963.
VII. John Boli, New Citizens for a New Society: The Institutional Origins of Mass Schooling in Sweden, Elsevier Ltd, 1989.
VIII. John Greville Pocock, The Ideal of Citizenship since Classical Times, In: Ronald Beiner (Editor), Theorizing Citizenship, State University of New York Press, Albany, 1995.
IX. Jon Elster, Solomonic Judgments, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1989.
X. Kathryn Dean, Capitalism and Citizenship: The Impossible Partnership, Routledge, London & New York, 2003.
XI. Kenneth J. Arrow, social Choice and Individual Values, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1951.
XII. Michael Walzer, Citizenship, In: Terence Ball, James Farr and Russel L. Hanson, Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge University Press, London, 1989.
XIII. Murray Print and Chuanbao Tan (Editors), Educating “Good” Citizens in a Globalising World for the Twenty-First Century, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, 2015.
XIV. Paweł Rudnicki, Citizenship and adult education under totalitarian regimes: The People's Republic of Poland, In: Barry J. Hake and Françoise F. Laot, The Social Question and Adult Education: European Perspectives in the 19th and 20th Centuries, Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang, Berlin, 2009.
XV. Richard Howson and Kylie Smith, Hegemony and the Operation of Consensus and Coercion, In: Richard Howson and Kylie Smith (Editors), Hegemony: Studies in Consensus and Coercion, Routledge, New York & London, 2008
XVI. Robert D. Putnam, Robert Leonardi and Raffaella Y. Nanetti, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1993.
XVII. Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way, Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2010.
XVIII. Thomas Sowell, The Vision of the Anointed: Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy, Basic Books, New York, 1995.
XIX. William V. Gehrlein‏ and Dominique Lepelley‏, Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence: The Condorcet Efficiency of Voting Rules, springer Publishers, Berlin, 2011.
Third: Periodicals.
I. Achim Goerres, Die soziale Norm der Wahlbeteiligung : Eine international vergleichende Analyse für Europa, Politische Vierteljahresschrift: German Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2010.
II. Adam David Morton, Social Forces in the Struggle over Hegemony: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Political Economy, Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture and Society, Volume (15), Issue (2), April 2003.
III. Allan H. Meltzer and Scott F. Richard, A Rational Theory of the Size of Government, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 89, No. 5, October 1981.
IV. Andrew Lintott, Aristotle and Democracy, The Classical Quarterly, New Series, Vol. 42, No. 1, 1992.
V. Bruce Grelle, Hegemony and The Universalization of Moral Ideas: Gramsci's Importance for Comparative Religious Ethics, Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 78, No. 3/4, Winter 1995.
VI. Carles Boix and Daniel N. Posner, Social Capital: Explaining Its Origins and Effects on Government Performance, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 28, No. 4, October 1998.
VII. Engin F. Isin, Citizenship in flux: The figure of the activist citizen, Subjectivity Journal, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2009.
VIII. Gordon Tullock, The General Irrelevance of the General Impossibility Theorem, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 81, No. 2, May 1967.
IX. Jan Teorell, Political participation and three theories of democracy: A research inventory and agenda, european Journal of Political Research, Vol. 45, No. 5, August 2005.
X. Jennifer Gaffney, Another Origin of Totalitarianism: Arendt on the Loneliness of Liberal Citizens, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2016.
XI. John R. Lott, Why Is Education Publicly Provided?: A Critical Survey, Cato Journal, vol. 7, No. 2, Fall 1987.
XII. John T. Scholz and Mark Lubell, Trust and Taxpaying: Testing the Heuristic Approach to Collective Action, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 42, No. 2, April 1998.
XIII. Jon Elster, Social Norms and Economic Theory, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 3, No. 4, Autumn 1989.
XIV. Leandros Fischer, Gramscian perspectives on citizenship: snapshots from the experience of regional migrants in the Republic of Cyprus, Citizenship Studies, Vol. 24, No. 8.
XV. Peter Kotzian, Good Governance and Norms of Citizenship: An Investigation into the System- and Individual-Level Determinants of Attachment to Civic Norms, The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 73, No. 1, January, 2014.
XVI. Philip J. Kain, Rousseau, the General Will, and Individual Liberty, History of Philosophy Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 3, July 1990.
XVII. Russel J. Dalton, Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation, Political Studies, Vol. 56, No. 1, 2008.
XVIII. Seymour Martin Lipset, Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, March 1959.
XIX. Terence K. Teo, Inequality under Authoritarian Rule, Government and Opposition Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2, April 2021.
XX. William Safran, Citizenship and Nationality in Democratic Systems: Approaches to Defining and Acquiring Membership in the Political Community, International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique, Volume (18), Issue (3), July 1997.
Fourth: Websites:
I. Marta Nunes da Costa, European Citizenship – Meanings and Practices of an (Almost Failed) Democratic Project, The European Consortium for Political Research, September 2013, At: https://bit.ly/3vHjRsz

Published

2022-08-25